We serve the priorities of our partners and trainees through bottom-up, iterative curriculum design.
Our curriculum design process centers around co-developing innovative lessons that are locally-relevant, understandable, and engaging for trainees. Using a four stage iterative development process, we ensure that our lessons are tailored to the exact case studies and difficulty levels that our trainees can get excited about.
-
We begin by holding repeated focus group sessions with our trainees and the leadership of our partner institution. These focus groups seek to identify the primary technical knowledge gaps of our trainee population and their preferred level of instruction, as well as the key environmental threat ase studies that they are most interested in investigating.
-
We hold a series of conversations on the most pressing environmental threats that our trainees are facing in their local region, identifying key areas of analysis that our partners want to prioritize in lessons. We discuss how satellite technology can be used to fill data gaps in understanding the extent and impact of these environmental threats
-
We design the technical curriculum of our workshop according to the results of our needs assessment and case study selection procedures, constantly iterating our design with frequent calls with our trainee focus groups and partner organization leadership. This stage of back-and-forth iteration ensures that the difficulty level and subject areas covered are exactly tailored to trainee needs and preferences.
-
After each workshop day, we hold a brief focus group session with our trainees to hear their feedback on the difficulty level and content of that day’s session. This enables us to adjust the next day’s content accordingly, enabling us to avoid missing opportunities for more closely tailoring our material to trainee needs. After the entire workshop concludes, we distribute surveys and hold a more comprehensive focus group to gauge trainee satisfaction with the course content, teaching style, difficulty level, and application to their personal work.
Our training logistics vary widely across audiences: we avoid a one-size-fits-all approach.
We deliver both online and in-person courses to accommodate a range of audience types. Our online courses are typically asynchronous, allowing trainees to watch video lectures and complete exercises at their own speed. Our online courses tare often organized in a “ladder” difficulty style, with easy, medium, and advanced videos recorded for each environmental threat case study. Both our in-person and online courses are taught using live coding, in which an instructor codes on screen and trainees follow along on their own devices.
We have delivered an extraordinarily wide range of training lengths, ranging from one hour general overviews to five day intensive workshops. The bottom line: we cater to our partner’s exact needs rather than using pre-set models that they must adjust themselves to.
Our workshops usually work best if participants come with basic to intermediate coding experience in any language. But we’ve delivered trainings to non-technical audiences on the general possibilities of satellite monitoring of environmental change, just as we’ve delivered trainings to highly advanced audiences on artificial intelligence applications of Earth observation technologies. Again, training difficulty is subject to the preferences of our trainee audience, and can always be modified mid-training.